Vol. 1, #1, January 24, 2012 |
||||||||||||
The Art and Practice of Neo-Ericksonian Hypnosis The Purpose of this Newsletter is to offer learning opportunities to you, the reader, in the area of Neo-Ericksonian Approaches to Hypnosis and Psychotherapy.
In our effort to do so we will be offering articles that we hope will be thought provoking, perhaps inspiring, possibly informative and illuminating. Upcoming articles will include instruction in Ericksonian Hypnotic Language Patterns, metaphor construction, hypnotic delivery, and many other related topics.
We also will be making you aware of exciting live
training events and training materials available to you. For instance, in March
Doug O'Brien and Associates will be putting on a story-telling workshop
called "Stories from the Outside Inn." The weekend seminar features Nick Kemp, from Leeds, England
co-presenting with Doug O'Brien. It is a delightful and yet eminently practical
class because people in all walks of life - even in business situations,
universally appreciate stories.
Click on the link on the side bar to learn more. We also will be presenting a two weekend "Neo-Ericksonian Hypnosis Training" later in
April and May. You can also find out about that by clicking the link in the
side bar.
The last thing I'll tell you about for now is a class we are NOT presenting but will be ATTENDING, a class in stage hypnosis by Justin Tranz. I've included a link to his sign up page for your edification. I've avoided Stage Hypnosis for years because Milton Erickson had issues with it that were (and are still) quite valid. Yet I have always thought it would be useful for me to know more about it from the inside out, if you will, so I've kept a look-out for a good training that would be convenient (i.e.. here in New York). Finally there is one and I'm really excited to take this class from a very well regarded professional, Justin Tranz. Wherefore NEO-Ericksonian Hypnosis?
Where did that
name come from and what is meant by it?
So which one is
right?
Are any of them
wrong?
Any of them
missing the boat entirely?
It is left to the
individual student to come to his or her own appreciation of what is most
effective and is in the best interest of the patient. So it seems natural
to finally accept that we have moved on from where Milton left off.
People like
Bandler, Wolinsky, Keeney and Gilligan have explored areas far beyond where
Milton went. It would be folly to ignore that and pretend that what Milton was
doing back 50 years ago was the only useful understanding. More-over, there are
teachings from people like Dr. Dave Dobson who's work was parallel to, but
different from, Erickson's. What do we do with learnings and insights like
that?
I believe we
incorporate and integrate all of our learning into what will be most useful and
helpful for our client. I believe "Neo-Ericksonian Hypnosis" is
respectful to the legacy of Milton H. Erickson while accepting the
responsibility of exploring and discovering what else there is to find.
I'm
grateful for you to be joining the conversation.
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||