Those of you who haven’t read it – well – here it is.
When I teach classes on (or write about) about Ericksonian Hypnotic Language Patterns, I make every effort to be clear that language patterns are NOT the be-all and end-all of Ericksonian Hypnosis or unconscious persuasion. In fact I would say that Language patterns are a quite small part of what makes Ericksonian Hypnosis truly effective.
It’s kind of like – what makes music effective?
Think about the last time you truly enjoyed listening to a musical performance. Did you enjoy it because the musician was playing your favorite song, or maybe had a beautiful voice? Did you enjoy it because the mood the music generated was just what you needed at that moment? Was it that the musician played the right notes and had excellent technique?
I’m guessing very few people would pick the right notes and good technique answer, and yet, what if they hadn’t played the right notes and didn’t play it or sing it very well. Those other “more important” parts wouldn’t have a chance to shine.
Even the best musicians practice fundamentals like scales everyday. Coincidence?
So, in the same way a musician practices scales and arpeggios, it behooves practitioners in the NLP and Hypnosis world to hone their skills on the instrument they have to work with. And so we study and practice language patterns.
The Art of the Story
To be a musical artist, of course, also requires that one learns to play some really good songs (either originals or covers) and learns to play them very well.
In the same way we, as personal change artists, need to learn some really good stories (either original or borrowed) – and learn how to deliver them really well.
As I’m sure you are aware, Milton Erickson was famous for his therapeutic stories. He is not alone. What do Richard Bandler, Rosanne Cash, Anthony Robbins, Marianne Williamson, and Dan Millman have in common? They are all great story tellers.
So, in addition to language patterns, we will also look at story and metaphor creation, tips on how to tell them really well and offer examples and resources from the literature.
Watch for this in these pages in the days and weeks to come.
Here’s a story you may or may not know having to do with yet another aspect of being persuasive, being congruent. I heard it years ago and imagine it has made the rounds. I do not know it’s source:
“Sometime in the 1940’s a poor indian woman travels across India with her child to have a private meeting with Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi was, by this time, a revered figure in India and the woman knew that if anyone could help her it would be the Mahatma. Her problem was that her son had a very bad addiction to refined sugar and his health and teeth were suffering as a result. She came to seek Gandhi’s help in getting her son to quit this bad habit.
When at last her turn came she gathered up her son and was ushered into Gandhi’s chamber. Gandhi listened to her story and thought for a moment.
“Come back in two weeks,” Gandhi said and walked out of the room. The woman had no other choice but to return home on the same arduous train trip across India and then back again after two weeks.
Two weeks later the woman and her son have made it back and once again are waiting for a meeting with Mahatma Gandhi. At long last they are admitted to his chamber.
Gandhi enters, looks at the boy and in a loud voice commands, “QUIT EATING SUGAR!” pauses for a moment for effect and then turns and begins to walk out.
“Not so fast, buster,” (or words to that effect) the woman says to the great man. “That’s it? That’s the whole thing? That’s what we traveled across the country for – twice?? Why couldn’t you have said that two weeks ago?”
Gandhi turned to her and smiled sweetly… “Because, you see, two weeks ago I was eating sugar.”
(For more on story telling see “Stories from the Outside Inn.”)